Optional: Finding compact abelian subgroups

Compact abelian subgroups exist

This video is optional.

Proposition:

Any compact matrix group G contains a compact abelian matrix group which is (a) path-connected and (b) nontrivial.

Remark:

In the next video, we'll see that any compact, path-connected abelian group is a torus, so together these results will show that G contains a nontrivial torus.

Proof:

Let π”₯βŠ‚π”€ be a nontrivial abelian subalgebra, that is a subspace of 𝔀 on which the commutator bracket vanishes.

Note that there is always a nontrivial abelian subalgebra if 𝔀 is nontrivial, for example a line in 𝔀 is a nontrivial abelian subalgebra: suppose we look at the line spanned by Xβˆˆπ”€ , then any two elements Ξ»1X and Ξ»2X of this line commute with one another.

We now make two claims:

  1. exp(π”₯)={exp(X):X∈π”₯} is an abelian subgroup of G .

  2. while exp(π”₯) is not necessarily compact, its topological closure Β―exp(π”₯) is a compact abelian subgroup.

Together, these claims will prove the proposition (we just need to take the path-component of the identity in Β―exp(π”₯) ).

  • To prove claim 1, we observe that exp(X1)exp(X2)=exp(X1+X2)

    for all X1,X2∈π”₯ because X1 and X2 commute. This implies that exp(π”₯) is a subgroup of G , because if exp(X1)∈exp(π”₯) and exp(X2)∈exp(π”₯) then exp(X1)exp(X2)=exp(X1+X2) and X1+X2∈π”₯ because π”₯ is a subspace.

    Moreover, exp(π”₯) is abelian, because: exp(X1)exp(X2)=exp(X1+X2)=exp(X2+X1)=exp(X2)exp(X1).

  • To prove claim 2, we showed earlier (as an exercise) that the topological closure of a subgroup is a subgroup, so we just need to show that Β―exp(π”₯) is compact and abelian. The fact that it's compact follows from the fact that it's closed (by construction) and contained in a compact set (the compact group G ), and it's a general fact from point-set topology that a closed subset of a compact set is compact. (This is clear for us because "compact" means "closed and bounded", and a subset of a bounded set is bounded).

    So the key thing to check is that Β―exp(π”₯) is abelian. This follows from the next lemma below.

  • Remark:

    Note that it's not always true that exp of a Lie subalgebra gives a subgroup of G .

    Lemma:

    If HβŠ‚G is an abelian subgroup then its topological closure Λ‰H is abelian.

    Proof:

    Λ‰H consists of limit points of sequences hk in H which converge in G . Suppose I have sequences gkβ†’g and hkβ†’h with gk,hk∈H , g,hβˆˆΛ‰H . Since H is abelian, we have gkhk=hkgk for all k.

    This implies that limgkhk=limhkgk,
    so it's enough to show that lim(gkhk)=gh and lim(hkgk)=hg.

    This follows from the fact that matrix multiplication is continuous. Let m:GL(n,𝐑)Γ—GL(n,𝐑)β†’GL(n,𝐑) be matrix multiplication, i.e. m(X,Y)=XY . This is continuous: it's actually a polynomial in the matrix entries. Therefore limm(gk,hk)=m(limgk,limhk)

    (you can "bring limits inside" continuous functions). This means exactly that gkhk→gh,
    as required.

    The proposition now follows by taking the path-component of the identity inside Β―exp(π”₯) .

    Example

    The following example should illustrate why I went to the bother of taking the topological closure and what it buys for us.

    Let G be the 2-dimensional torus U(1)Γ—U(1) . We can draw it as a square with its opposite sides identified (the square lives in the (ΞΈ1,ΞΈ2) -plane, and the side-identifications correspond to when ΞΈ1 or ΞΈ2 cross over a multiple of 2Ο€ and restart from zero.

    Torus as a square with its opposite sides identified

    On the square, a 1-parameter subgroup of G will look like a bunch of straight line segments with the property that when one of the segments "leaves the square", another one re-enters the square at the opposite point (with the same slope).

    Remember that a 1-parameter subgroup is precisely exp of a line in the Lie algebra. Pick a 1-parameter subgroup corresponding to a line of irrational slope. This will wrap around infinitely often in the group G : in fact, it is dense in G (comes arbitrarily close to any given point). The topological closure of this subgroup is then the whole of G .

    Dense line of irrational slope on a torus