Any compact matrix group G contains a compact abelian matrix group which is (a) path-connected and (b) nontrivial.
Optional: Finding compact abelian subgroups
Compact abelian subgroups exist
This video is optional.
In the next video, we'll see that any compact, path-connected abelian group is a torus, so together these results will show that G contains a nontrivial torus.
Let π₯βπ€ be a nontrivial abelian subalgebra, that is a subspace of π€ on which the commutator bracket vanishes.
Note that there is always a nontrivial abelian subalgebra if π€ is nontrivial, for example a line in π€ is a nontrivial abelian subalgebra: suppose we look at the line spanned by Xβπ€ , then any two elements Ξ»1X and Ξ»2X of this line commute with one another.
We now make two claims:
-
exp(π₯)={exp(X):Xβπ₯} is an abelian subgroup of G .
-
while exp(π₯) is not necessarily compact, its topological closure Β―exp(π₯) is a compact abelian subgroup.
Together, these claims will prove the proposition (we just need to take the path-component of the identity in Β―exp(π₯) ).
To prove claim 1, we observe that exp(X1)exp(X2)=exp(X1+X2)
Moreover, exp(π₯) is abelian, because: exp(X1)exp(X2)=exp(X1+X2)=exp(X2+X1)=exp(X2)exp(X1).
To prove claim 2, we showed earlier (as an exercise) that the topological closure of a subgroup is a subgroup, so we just need to show that Β―exp(π₯) is compact and abelian. The fact that it's compact follows from the fact that it's closed (by construction) and contained in a compact set (the compact group G ), and it's a general fact from point-set topology that a closed subset of a compact set is compact. (This is clear for us because "compact" means "closed and bounded", and a subset of a bounded set is bounded).
So the key thing to check is that Β―exp(π₯) is abelian. This follows from the next lemma below.
Note that it's not always true that exp of a Lie subalgebra gives a subgroup of G .
If HβG is an abelian subgroup then its topological closure ΛH is abelian.
ΛH consists of limit points of sequences hk in H which converge in G . Suppose I have sequences gkβg and hkβh with gk,hkβH , g,hβΛH . Since H is abelian, we have gkhk=hkgk for all k.
This follows from the fact that matrix multiplication is continuous. Let m:GL(n,π)ΓGL(n,π)βGL(n,π) be matrix multiplication, i.e. m(X,Y)=XY . This is continuous: it's actually a polynomial in the matrix entries. Therefore limm(gk,hk)=m(limgk,limhk)
The proposition now follows by taking the path-component of the identity inside Β―exp(π₯) .
Example
The following example should illustrate why I went to the bother of taking the topological closure and what it buys for us.
Let G be the 2-dimensional torus U(1)ΓU(1) . We can draw it as a square with its opposite sides identified (the square lives in the (ΞΈ1,ΞΈ2) -plane, and the side-identifications correspond to when ΞΈ1 or ΞΈ2 cross over a multiple of 2Ο and restart from zero.

On the square, a 1-parameter subgroup of G will look like a bunch of straight line segments with the property that when one of the segments "leaves the square", another one re-enters the square at the opposite point (with the same slope).
Remember that a 1-parameter subgroup is precisely exp of a line in the Lie algebra. Pick a 1-parameter subgroup corresponding to a line of irrational slope. This will wrap around infinitely often in the group G : in fact, it is dense in G (comes arbitrarily close to any given point). The topological closure of this subgroup is then the whole of G .
