Optional: Finding compact abelian subgroups

Compact abelian subgroups exist

This video is optional.

Proposition:

Any compact matrix group G contains a compact abelian matrix group which is (a) path-connected and (b) nontrivial.

Remark:

In the next video, we'll see that any compact, path-connected abelian group is a torus, so together these results will show that G contains a nontrivial torus.

Proof:

Let π”₯ βŠ‚ 𝔀 be a nontrivial abelian subalgebra, that is a subspace of 𝔀 on which the commutator bracket vanishes.

Note that there is always a nontrivial abelian subalgebra if 𝔀 is nontrivial, for example a line in 𝔀 is a nontrivial abelian subalgebra: suppose we look at the line spanned by X ∈ 𝔀 , then any two elements Ξ» 1 ⁒ X and Ξ» 2 ⁒ X of this line commute with one another.

We now make two claims:

  1. exp ⁑ ( π”₯ ) = { exp ⁑ ( X ) : X ∈ π”₯ } is an abelian subgroup of G .

  2. while exp ⁑ ( π”₯ ) is not necessarily compact, its topological closure exp ⁑ ( π”₯ ) Β― is a compact abelian subgroup.

Together, these claims will prove the proposition (we just need to take the path-component of the identity in exp ⁑ ( π”₯ ) Β― ).

  • To prove claim 1, we observe that exp ⁑ ( X 1 ) ⁒ exp ⁑ ( X 2 ) = exp ⁑ ( X 1 + X 2 ) for all X 1 , X 2 ∈ π”₯ because X 1 and X 2 commute. This implies that exp ⁑ ( π”₯ ) is a subgroup of G , because if exp ⁑ ( X 1 ) ∈ exp ⁑ ( π”₯ ) and exp ⁑ ( X 2 ) ∈ exp ⁑ ( π”₯ ) then exp ⁑ ( X 1 ) ⁒ exp ⁑ ( X 2 ) = exp ⁑ ( X 1 + X 2 ) and X 1 + X 2 ∈ π”₯ because π”₯ is a subspace.

    Moreover, exp ⁑ ( π”₯ ) is abelian, because: exp ⁑ ( X 1 ) ⁒ exp ⁑ ( X 2 ) = exp ⁑ ( X 1 + X 2 ) = exp ⁑ ( X 2 + X 1 ) = exp ⁑ ( X 2 ) ⁒ exp ⁑ ( X 1 ) .

  • To prove claim 2, we showed earlier (as an exercise) that the topological closure of a subgroup is a subgroup, so we just need to show that exp ⁑ ( π”₯ ) Β― is compact and abelian. The fact that it's compact follows from the fact that it's closed (by construction) and contained in a compact set (the compact group G ), and it's a general fact from point-set topology that a closed subset of a compact set is compact. (This is clear for us because "compact" means "closed and bounded", and a subset of a bounded set is bounded).

    So the key thing to check is that exp ⁑ ( π”₯ ) Β― is abelian. This follows from the next lemma below.

  • Remark:

    Note that it's not always true that exp of a Lie subalgebra gives a subgroup of G .

    Lemma:

    If H βŠ‚ G is an abelian subgroup then its topological closure H Β― is abelian.

    Proof:

    H Β― consists of limit points of sequences h k in H which converge in G . Suppose I have sequences g k β†’ g and h k β†’ h with g k , h k ∈ H , g , h ∈ H Β― . Since H is abelian, we have g k ⁒ h k = h k ⁒ g k ⁒ Β for allΒ  ⁒ k . This implies that lim ⁑ g k ⁒ h k = lim ⁑ h k ⁒ g k , so it's enough to show that lim ⁑ ( g k ⁒ h k ) = g ⁒ h ⁒ Β andΒ  ⁒ lim ⁑ ( h k ⁒ g k ) = h ⁒ g .

    This follows from the fact that matrix multiplication is continuous. Let m : G ⁒ L ⁒ ( n , 𝐑 ) Γ— G ⁒ L ⁒ ( n , 𝐑 ) β†’ G ⁒ L ⁒ ( n , 𝐑 ) be matrix multiplication, i.e. m ⁒ ( X , Y ) = X ⁒ Y . This is continuous: it's actually a polynomial in the matrix entries. Therefore lim ⁑ m ⁒ ( g k , h k ) = m ⁒ ( lim ⁑ g k , lim ⁑ h k ) (you can "bring limits inside" continuous functions). This means exactly that g k ⁒ h k β†’ g ⁒ h , as required.

    The proposition now follows by taking the path-component of the identity inside exp ⁑ ( π”₯ ) Β― .

    Example

    The following example should illustrate why I went to the bother of taking the topological closure and what it buys for us.

    Let G be the 2-dimensional torus U ⁒ ( 1 ) Γ— U ⁒ ( 1 ) . We can draw it as a square with its opposite sides identified (the square lives in the ( ΞΈ 1 , ΞΈ 2 ) -plane, and the side-identifications correspond to when ΞΈ 1 or ΞΈ 2 cross over a multiple of 2 ⁒ Ο€ and restart from zero.

    Torus as a square with its opposite sides identified

    On the square, a 1-parameter subgroup of G will look like a bunch of straight line segments with the property that when one of the segments "leaves the square", another one re-enters the square at the opposite point (with the same slope).

    Remember that a 1-parameter subgroup is precisely exp of a line in the Lie algebra. Pick a 1-parameter subgroup corresponding to a line of irrational slope. This will wrap around infinitely often in the group G : in fact, it is dense in G (comes arbitrarily close to any given point). The topological closure of this subgroup is then the whole of G .

    Dense line of irrational slope on a torus