Below the video you will find notes and some pre-class questions. Once
again, sorry for the gurgling background noises: I can't turn off my
office radiator.
(0.00) Let B be an n-strand braid inside
D2×[0,1]. If we take the quotient space D2×S1=(D2×[0,1])/∼, (x,0)∼(x,1), then the braid closes
up to become a collection of embedded circles CB in D2×S1 (because the component paths Bk(t) start and end in the set
of points z1,…,zn). This is called the braid closureCB of B.
Here is an example: the braid closure of the 2-strand braid
σ31 is the trefoil knot:
(1.59) Let XB=(D2×S1)∖CB denote the
complement of CB⊂D2×S1. Let
x=[1,0]∈(D2×[0,1])/∼ (we are thinking of
D2⊂C, so 1∈D2 makes sense). We have
π1(XB,x)=⟨α1,…,αn,g|gαkg−1=B(αk) for k=1,…,n⟩.
Here, g is the loop x×S1 and, for
k∈{1,…,n}, αk is the
element of π1(D2∖{z1,…,zn} given by the loop
in the figure below and B(αk) denotes the Artin
action of B on
αk∈π1(D2∖{z1,…,zn}≅Z⋆n.
(3.01) The space XB is the mapping torus of the homeomorphism
ArtB:D2∖{z1,…,zn}→D2∖{z1,…,zn},
so the lemma follows from the
result we proved earlier which gave a presentation for the
fundamental group of a mapping torus.
Consider the 2-strand braid σ1 (whose braid closure is an
unknot). We have
σ1(α)=αβα−1,σ1(β)=α,
so the presentation for π1(Xσ1) is:
⟨α,β,g|gαg−1=αβα−1,gβg−1=α⟩.
(8.44) If we embed D2×S1 as the standard solid torus
in R3 then the complement of the braid closure
CB⊂R3 has
π1(R3∖CB)=⟨α1,…,αk|αk=B(αk),k=1,…,n⟩
where B(αk) is the Artin action of B on the free group ⟨α1,…,αk⟩.
(A homotopy retract of) the complement R3∖CB is
obtained from XB by attaching a 2-cell along the circle x×S1, which adds the relation x=1 to the presentation
from the lemma, yielding the desired presentation.
(11.26) Consider the 2-strand braid σ1 (whose braid
closure is an unknot). We have
π1(Xσ1)=⟨α,β,g|gαg−1=αβα−1,gβg−1=α⟩
so the
Wirtinger presentation is obtained by setting g=1:
⟨α,β|α=αβα−1,β=α⟩.
We can simplify this to just get ⟨α⟩, so the
fundamental group is Z.
I said that this allows us to compute the fundamental group of any
knot complement: this is because one can show that any knot is
isotopic to a braid closure; a proof of this was first written down
by Alexander (1923, ``A lemma on a system of knotted curves'') and
it is quite readable.
Pre-class questions
The video claimed that "any braid gives a knot by taking the braid
closure". Why was this claim false? What should I have said instead?