8.02 Covering transformations

Below the video you will find accompanying notes and some pre-class questions.

Notes

Definition, existence and uniqueness

(3.32) Let p1:Y1X and p2:Y2X be covering spaces, let xX and let y1p11(x) and y2p12(x). Then there exists a covering transformation F:(Y1,p1)(Y2,p2) such that F(y1)=y2 if and only if (p1)π1(Y1,y1)(p2)π1(Y2,y2)
as subgroups of π1(X,x). Moreover, if such a covering transformation exists then it is unique (uniquely determined by the condition F(y1)=y2)).

(6.38) There is a covering isomorphism F:(Y1,p1)(Y2,p2) if and only if (p1)π1(Y1,y1)=(p2)π1(Y2,y2) as subgroups of π1(X,x).

(7.40) The theorem follows immediately from the lifting criterion applied to the following situation. Take T=Y1 and f=p1:Y1X. A covering transformation F:Y1Y2 is precisely a lift of p1 to a map Y1Y2. We see that the statement of the theorem is just the lifting criterion applied to this siutation.

Example

(9.44) Let X=S1 and take Y1=S1, Y2=S1 with covering maps p1(z)=zm and p2(z)=zn. When is there a covering transformation F:Y1Y2? The pushforward (p1)π1(Y1,1) is the subgroup mZZ. The pushforward (p2)π1(Y2,1) is the subgroup nZZ. Therefore the criterion from the theorem holds if and only if n divides m.

(11.54) For example, if m=6 and n=2 then we can take F(z)=z3 and we get p1(z)=z6=(z3)2=F(p1(z)) so F is a covering transformation. We could also take F(z)=z3 because (z3)2=z6 too. This exhausts the possible covering transformations Y1Y2 because a covering transformation is determined by its value at a single point, F(1), and we need F(1)=±1 because 1=p1(1)=p2(F(1))=(F(1))2.

(14.47) Note that zz3 is again a covering map. We will now see that this is a general feature.

Covering transformations are covering maps

(15.00) Assume that p1:Y1X and p2:Y2X are covering spaces and that Y2 is path-connected. A covering transformation F:Y1Y2 is a covering map.
(16.04) Each xX has an elementary neighbourhood U1 for p1 and U2 for p2, so U:=U1U2 is an elementary neighbourhood for both simultaneously.

(17.55) F is surjective. To see this, pick a point y2Y2. We want to find a point zY1 such that F(z)=y2. Pick a point y1Y1 and a path α in Y2 from F(y1) to y2. This projects along p2 to give a path p2α from p1(y1) to p2(y2). Path-lifting for p1 yields a path ~p2α in Y1 from y1 to some point z. Applying F to this gives a path F~p2α in Y2 from y1 to F(z).

(20.15) We have p2(F~p2α)=p1~p2α=p2α, so F~p2α and α are both paths lifting p2α along p2 satisfying the initial condition F(~p2α(0))=α(0)=y2. Therefore they agree by uniqueness of lifts, so their endpoints, F(z) and y2, agree, so F(z)=y2 and we see that F is surjective.

(22.32) F is a covering map. Fix a point y2Y2. We want to find an elementary neighbourhood around y2 together with a local inverse for F. Let x=p2(y2) and let xUX be an elementary neighbourhood simultaneously for p1 and p2. For each y1F1(y2) (which is non-empty because F is surjective) we have an elementary sheet y1VY1 for p1 living over U and a local inverse q:UV with q(x)=y1. Let y2WY2 be an elementary sheet for p2 over U. The map q(p2)|W:WV is a local inverse for F. If we do this for all our elementary sheets, we deduce that F is a covering map.

Pre-class questions

1. In the proof that covering transformations are covering maps, why is q(p2)|W a local inverse for F? 2. Because I was using the lifting criterion, I should have added an assumption about my spaces in the first theorem. What should I have said?

Navigation

Comments, corrections and contributions are very welcome; please drop me an email at j.d.evans at lancaster.ac.uk if you have something to share.

CC-BY-SA 4.0 Jonny Evans.