In this video, we will prove the following theorem which was stated earlier:
Theorem:
If F:GβH
is a smooth homomorphism of matrix groups and f
denotes the locally-defined map logβFβexp:π€βπ₯
then:
f
is the restriction of a linear map F*:π€βπ₯
to a neighbourhood of 0βπ€
.
F(expX)=exp(F*(X))
for all Xβπ€
,
F*[X,Y]=[F*X,F*Y]
for all X
and Y
in π€
.
Proof of theorem
Proof:
Our first observation is that, for all Xβπ€
, exp(tX)
is a 1-parameter subgroup. Since F
is a smooth homomorphism, and since a 1-parameter subgroup is just a smooth homomorphism from π
, we deduce that F(exp(tX))
is a 1-parameter subgroup in H
. By what we proved about 1-parameter subgroups, F(exp(tX))=exp(tY)
for some Yβπ₯
.
The figure above shows the groups G
and H
, the paths exp(tX)
and exp(tY)
, and (red) neighbourhoods of the identity in each on which the logarithm is well-defined. For small t
, exp(tX)
and exp(tY)
are both close to the identity, so live in the domain of the local logarithm.
We have F(exp(tX))=exp(f(tX))
for small t
and F(exp(tX))=exp(tY)
for all t
. Therefore, for small t
we can take logarithms and deduce that f(tX)=tY
.
Since f
is a smooth map, we can take the Taylor series f(tX)=td0f(X)+higher order in t
, where d0f
is the derivative of f
at 0
. Because f(tX)=tY
, we see that d0f(X)=Y
and all higher order terms vanish.
This means that f(tX)=tY=td0f(X)=d0f(tX)
for all X
and all sufficiently small t
. Therefore f=d0f
on the domain of the exponential chart. We take F*=d0f
. This proves the first part of the theorem. Recall that the matrix for the linear map d0f
is the matrix of partial derivatives of components of f
, d0f=(βfiβxj).
The second part follows from what we have already said: we showed that F(exptX)=exp(tY)
(for all t
), and Y=d0f(X)=F*(X)
. Setting t=1
we get F(expX)=exp(F*(X))
.
To prove the final part of the theorem, consider the expression exp(tX)exp(tY)exp(-tX)exp(-tY)
Use the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula to multiply the first two and last two terms together and we get exp(t(X+Y)+12t2[X,Y]+β―)exp(-t(X+Y)+12t2[X,Y]+β―)
Using the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula to multiply these two together, after a little manipulation, we get exp(t2[X,Y]+πͺ(t3)).
If I apply F
to this whole expression, we get: F(exp(t2[X,Y]+πͺ(t3)))=exp(t2F*[X,Y]+πͺ(t3))
by definition of F*
.
Because F
is a homomorphism, F(exp(tX)exp(tY)exp(-tX)exp(-tY))=F(exp(tX))F(exp(tY))F(exp(-tX))F(exp(-tY)).
By definition of F*
, this equals exp(tF*X)exp(tF*Y)exp(-tF*X)exp(-tF*Y)
and using the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula in the same way we get exp(t2[F*X,F*Y]+πͺ(π3))
If we take t
small then we can take logarithms and we get t2[F*X,F*Y]=t2F*[X,Y]+πͺ(t3).
Differentiating twice and setting t=0
we get F*[X,Y]=[F*X,F*Y]
as required.