X and Y example

Review

So far we have seen that, given a complex representation R:SU(2)GL(V) , we get:

Define the basis H=(100-1) , X=(0100) and Y=(0010) of 𝔰𝔲(2) . We saw that V=Wm where Wm={vV:R𝐂*(H)v=mv} and saw that X and Y act on weight spaces as follows:

  • X takes vectors in Wm to vectors in Wm+2 ,

  • Y takes vectors in Wm to vectors in Wm-2 .

  • Arrows on the weight diagram indicating how X, Y and H act

    We will usually omit the superscript 𝐂 from R𝐂* and actually, we'll usually omit the R* altogether.

    In this video, I want to see how this actually works in practice for the example Sym2(𝐂2) . But first, we will need to understand how Lie algebras act on symmetric powers and, more generally, tensor products.

    Leibniz rule

    Recall that R2(g)(v1v2)=(R(g)v1)(R(g)v2) . What is the Lie algebra representation corresponding to this? In other words, what is (R2)* ?

    Lemma:

    If R:GGL(V) is a representation and X𝔤 (this is not necessarily the X in 𝔰𝔩(2,𝐂) ) we have (Rn)*(X)(v1vn)=(R*(X)v1)v2vn+v1(R*(X)v2)vn++v1R*(X)vn. In other words, we use the "Leibniz/product rule".

    For now, we will assume this lemma, work out the example and then justify the lemma.

    Example: Sym2(C2)

    Example:

    Let V=Sym2(𝐂2) . If e1 and e2 form a basis for 𝐂2 then e21=e1e1 , e1e2=e1e2+e2e1 and e22=e2e2 form a basis for Sym2(𝐂2) . The Lie algebra elements H , X and Y act on e1 and e2 as follows:

    • Since H=(100-1) , we have He1=e1 , He2=-e2 ,

    • Since X=(0100) , we have Xe1=0 , Xe2=e1 ,

    • Since Y=(0010) , we have Ye1=e2 , Ye2=0 .

    Sym2(H) therefore sends e21=e1e1 to (He1)e1+e1(He1)=2e21 by the product rule. Similarly, Sym2(H)(e1e2)=(He1)e2+e1(He2)=e1e2-e1e2=0 and Sym2(H)(e22)=-2e22. The weight spaces, that is the eigenspaces of H , are spanned by e21 (weight 2), e1e2 (weight 0) and e22 (weight -2 ).

    Let's compute Sym2(X) :

  • Sym2(X)(e21)=(Xe1)e1+e1(Xe1)=0.

  • Sym2(X)(e1e2)=(Xe1)e2+e1(Xe2)=e21.

  • Sym2(X)(e22)=(Xe2)e2+e2(Xe2)=2e1e2.

  • Notice that in this last example we used the fact that e1e2=e2e1 (which holds because it's a symmetric tensor).

    In terms of our weight diagram, we can see that Sym2(X) is taking e22W-2 to 2e1e2W0 (increasing the weight by 2) and e1e2W0 to e21W2 (again, increasing the weight by 2). Finally, it takes e21W2 to 0W4 (necessarily, since W4=0 ).

    It's an exercise to calculate Sym2(Y) .

    Proof of lemma

    We still need to prove that (Rn)* can be evaluated using the Leibniz rule, as stated in the lemma.

    We have (Rn)(exptX)=exp(t(Rn)*X) by our usual formula for Lie algebra representations.

    Let's apply both sides to v1vn and expand both sides in powers of t . The right-hand side is (I+t(Rn)*X+𝒪(t2))(v1vn)=v1vn+t(Rn)*X(v1vn)+𝒪(t2). The left-hand side is R(exp(tX))v1R(exp(tX))vn

    We have R(exp(tX))vi=(I+tR*X+𝒪(t2))vi=vi+tR*Xvi+𝒪(t2) , so multiplying out the brackets, the left-hand side becomes: v1vn+t(R*Xv1v2vn+v1R*Xv2vn+v1R*Xvn)+𝒪(t2).

    By comparing the terms of order t , we get the desired formula for (Rn)*(X) .

    Pre-class exercise

    Exercise:

    Compute the action of Sym2(Y) on the basis e21 , e1e2 , e22 .