If R:G→GL(V) is a representation and X∈𝔤 (this is not necessarily the X in 𝔰𝔩(2,𝐂) ) we have (R⊗n)*(X)(v1⊗⋯⊗vn)=(R*(X)v1)⊗v2⊗⋯⊗vn+v1⊗(R*(X)v2)⊗⋯⊗vn+⋯+v1⊗⋯⊗R*(X)vn. In other words, we use the "Leibniz/product rule".
X and Y example
Review
So far we have seen that, given a complex representation R:SU(2)→GL(V) , we get:
-
a (real linear) representation R*:𝔰𝔲(2)→𝔤𝔩(V) of the real Lie algebra 𝔰𝔲(2)
-
a (complex linear) representation R𝐂*:𝔰𝔩(2,𝐂)→𝔤𝔩(V) of its complexification 𝔰𝔩(2,𝐂)=𝔰𝔲(2)⊗𝐂 .
Define the basis H=(100-1) , X=(0100) and Y=(0010) of 𝔰𝔲(2) . We saw that V=⊕Wm where Wm={v∈V:R𝐂*(H)v=mv} and saw that X and Y act on weight spaces as follows:
X takes vectors in Wm to vectors in Wm+2 ,
Y takes vectors in Wm to vectors in Wm-2 .

We will usually omit the superscript 𝐂 from R𝐂* and actually, we'll usually omit the R* altogether.
In this video, I want to see how this actually works in practice for the example Sym2(𝐂2) . But first, we will need to understand how Lie algebras act on symmetric powers and, more generally, tensor products.
Leibniz rule
Recall that R⊗2(g)(v1⊗v2)=(R(g)v1)⊗(R(g)v2) . What is the Lie algebra representation corresponding to this? In other words, what is (R⊗2)* ?
For now, we will assume this lemma, work out the example and then justify the lemma.
Example: Sym2(C2)
Let V=Sym2(𝐂2) . If e1 and e2 form a basis for 𝐂2 then e21=e1⊗e1 , e1e2=e1⊗e2+e2⊗e1 and e22=e2⊗e2 form a basis for Sym2(𝐂2) . The Lie algebra elements H , X and Y act on e1 and e2 as follows:
-
Since H=(100-1) , we have He1=e1 , He2=-e2 ,
-
Since X=(0100) , we have Xe1=0 , Xe2=e1 ,
-
Since Y=(0010) , we have Ye1=e2 , Ye2=0 .
Sym2(H) therefore sends e21=e1⊗e1 to (He1)⊗e1+e1⊗(He1)=2e21 by the product rule. Similarly, Sym2(H)(e1e2)=(He1)e2+e1(He2)=e1e2-e1e2=0 and Sym2(H)(e22)=-2e22. The weight spaces, that is the eigenspaces of H , are spanned by e21 (weight 2), e1e2 (weight 0) and e22 (weight -2 ).
Let's compute Sym2(X) :
Sym2(X)(e21)=(Xe1)e1+e1(Xe1)=0.
Sym2(X)(e1e2)=(Xe1)e2+e1(Xe2)=e21.
Sym2(X)(e22)=(Xe2)e2+e2(Xe2)=2e1e2.
Notice that in this last example we used the fact that e1e2=e2e1 (which holds because it's a symmetric tensor).
In terms of our weight diagram, we can see that Sym2(X) is taking e22∈W-2 to 2e1e2∈W0 (increasing the weight by 2) and e1e2∈W0 to e21∈W2 (again, increasing the weight by 2). Finally, it takes e21∈W2 to 0∈W4 (necessarily, since W4=0 ).
It's an exercise to calculate Sym2(Y) .
Proof of lemma
We still need to prove that (R⊗n)* can be evaluated using the Leibniz rule, as stated in the lemma.
We have (R⊗n)(exptX)=exp(t(R⊗n)*X) by our usual formula for Lie algebra representations.
Let's apply both sides to v1⊗⋯⊗vn and expand both sides in powers of t . The right-hand side is (I+t(R⊗n)*X+𝒪(t2))(v1⊗⋯⊗vn)=v1⊗⋯⊗vn+t(R⊗n)*X(v1⊗⋯⊗vn)+𝒪(t2). The left-hand side is R(exp(tX))v1⊗⋯⊗R(exp(tX))vn
We have R(exp(tX))vi=(I+tR*X+𝒪(t2))vi=vi+tR*Xvi+𝒪(t2) , so multiplying out the brackets, the left-hand side becomes: v1⊗⋯⊗vn+t(R*Xv1⊗v2⊗⋯⊗vn+v1⊗R*Xv2⊗⋯⊗vn+v1⊗⋯⊗R*Xvn)+𝒪(t2).
By comparing the terms of order t , we get the desired formula for (R⊗n)*(X) .
Pre-class exercise
Compute the action of Sym2(Y) on the basis e21 , e1e2 , e22 .