X and Y example

Review

So far we have seen that, given a complex representation R : S U ( 2 ) G L ( V ) , we get:

Define the basis H = ( 1 0 0 - 1 ) , X = ( 0 1 0 0 ) and Y = ( 0 0 1 0 ) of 𝔰 𝔲 ( 2 ) . We saw that V = W m where W m = { v V : R * 𝐂 ( H ) v = m v } and saw that X and Y act on weight spaces as follows:

  • X takes vectors in W m to vectors in W m + 2 ,

  • Y takes vectors in W m to vectors in W m - 2 .

  • Arrows on the weight diagram indicating how X, Y and H act

    We will usually omit the superscript 𝐂 from R * 𝐂 and actually, we'll usually omit the R * altogether.

    In this video, I want to see how this actually works in practice for the example Sym 2 ( 𝐂 2 ) . But first, we will need to understand how Lie algebras act on symmetric powers and, more generally, tensor products.

    Leibniz rule

    Recall that R 2 ( g ) ( v 1 v 2 ) = ( R ( g ) v 1 ) ( R ( g ) v 2 ) . What is the Lie algebra representation corresponding to this? In other words, what is ( R 2 ) * ?

    Lemma:

    If R : G G L ( V ) is a representation and X 𝔤 (this is not necessarily the X in 𝔰 𝔩 ( 2 , 𝐂 ) ) we have ( R n ) * ( X ) ( v 1 v n ) = ( R * ( X ) v 1 ) v 2 v n + v 1 ( R * ( X ) v 2 ) v n + + v 1 R * ( X ) v n . In other words, we use the "Leibniz/product rule".

    For now, we will assume this lemma, work out the example and then justify the lemma.

    Example: Sym2(C2)

    Example:

    Let V = Sym 2 ( 𝐂 2 ) . If e 1 and e 2 form a basis for 𝐂 2 then e 1 2 = e 1 e 1 , e 1 e 2 = e 1 e 2 + e 2 e 1 and e 2 2 = e 2 e 2 form a basis for Sym 2 ( 𝐂 2 ) . The Lie algebra elements H , X and Y act on e 1 and e 2 as follows:

    • Since H = ( 1 0 0 - 1 ) , we have H e 1 = e 1 , H e 2 = - e 2 ,

    • Since X = ( 0 1 0 0 ) , we have X e 1 = 0 , X e 2 = e 1 ,

    • Since Y = ( 0 0 1 0 ) , we have Y e 1 = e 2 , Y e 2 = 0 .

    Sym 2 ( H ) therefore sends e 1 2 = e 1 e 1 to ( H e 1 ) e 1 + e 1 ( H e 1 ) = 2 e 1 2 by the product rule. Similarly, Sym 2 ( H ) ( e 1 e 2 ) = ( H e 1 ) e 2 + e 1 ( H e 2 ) = e 1 e 2 - e 1 e 2 = 0 and Sym 2 ( H ) ( e 2 2 ) = - 2 e 2 2 . The weight spaces, that is the eigenspaces of H , are spanned by e 1 2 (weight 2), e 1 e 2 (weight 0) and e 2 2 (weight - 2 ).

    Let's compute Sym 2 ( X ) :

  • Sym 2 ( X ) ( e 1 2 ) = ( X e 1 ) e 1 + e 1 ( X e 1 ) = 0 .

  • Sym 2 ( X ) ( e 1 e 2 ) = ( X e 1 ) e 2 + e 1 ( X e 2 ) = e 1 2 .

  • Sym 2 ( X ) ( e 2 2 ) = ( X e 2 ) e 2 + e 2 ( X e 2 ) = 2 e 1 e 2 .

  • Notice that in this last example we used the fact that e 1 e 2 = e 2 e 1 (which holds because it's a symmetric tensor).

    In terms of our weight diagram, we can see that Sym 2 ( X ) is taking e 2 2 W - 2 to 2 e 1 e 2 W 0 (increasing the weight by 2) and e 1 e 2 W 0 to e 1 2 W 2 (again, increasing the weight by 2). Finally, it takes e 1 2 W 2 to 0 W 4 (necessarily, since W 4 = 0 ).

    It's an exercise to calculate Sym 2 ( Y ) .

    Proof of lemma

    We still need to prove that ( R n ) * can be evaluated using the Leibniz rule, as stated in the lemma.

    We have ( R n ) ( exp t X ) = exp ( t ( R n ) * X ) by our usual formula for Lie algebra representations.

    Let's apply both sides to v 1 v n and expand both sides in powers of t . The right-hand side is ( I + t ( R n ) * X + 𝒪 ( t 2 ) ) ( v 1 v n ) = v 1 v n + t ( R n ) * X ( v 1 v n ) + 𝒪 ( t 2 ) . The left-hand side is R ( exp ( t X ) ) v 1 R ( exp ( t X ) ) v n

    We have R ( exp ( t X ) ) v i = ( I + t R * X + 𝒪 ( t 2 ) ) v i = v i + t R * X v i + 𝒪 ( t 2 ) , so multiplying out the brackets, the left-hand side becomes: v 1 v n + t ( R * X v 1 v 2 v n + v 1 R * X v 2 v n + v 1 R * X v n ) + 𝒪 ( t 2 ) .

    By comparing the terms of order t , we get the desired formula for ( R n ) * ( X ) .

    Pre-class exercise

    Exercise:

    Compute the action of Sym 2 ( Y ) on the basis e 1 2 , e 1 e 2 , e 2 2 .